 |
Samples of our work
-
The
samples below provide concrete evidence of how our editing helps
improve the original copy submitted
-
The
original text uses arcane and difficult language
-
We have
simplified the language and made it more interesting and easier to
read while scrupulously retaining the meaning contained in the
original.
|
UNEDITED DOCUMENT |
AFTER BEING EDITED BY
OUR TEAM |
|
Medical Document
Sample : I |
|
The cells were
digested by 0.02%EDTA from culture dishes. Added cells in
coverslips cautionally. Added 30 uL of 4% Paraformaldehyde to fix
the dried cells for 30 min at room-temperature, then washed them
with dH 2 O for 5 min; added 30 uL of primary antibody(rabbit
anti-human K-ras, Boshide Co.) in a 1:100 dilution with PBS to the
cells, incubated them in a humidified chamber for 90 min at room
temperature, then washed three times with PBS for 5 min, added 30
uL 0f second antibody with FITC( goal anti-rabbit IgM, Proteintech
Group Inc. USA) in a 1:100 dilution with PBS then incubated them
in a humidified chamber for 2 h at room temperature; washed with
PBS for 5 min again, observed the cells through fluorescence
microscope and recorded them. |
The cells were digested by 0.02% EDTA
from culture dishes and.
Addedcells
were added in coverslips with
cautionally.
Thirty microliters
Added 30 uL of 4%
pParaformaldehyde
werewas
added to fix the dried cells for 30 min at room-
temperature, andthen
washed themwith dH2O
for 5 min; added30
µuL
of primary antibody werewas
added (rabbit anti-human K-ras, Boshide Co.) in a 1:100
dilution with PBS to the cells, incubated
them in a humidified chamber for
90 min at room temperature, andthen
washed three timesthrice
with PBS for 5 min;,added
30 µuL
o0f
second antibody werewas
added with FITC (goatl
anti-rabbit IgM, Proteintech Group Inc.,
USA) in a 1:100 dilution with PBS,then
incubated themin a humidified
chamber for 2 h at room temperature; again
washed with PBS for 5 minagain,
andobserved
the cells were
observed and recorded usingthrough
fluorescence microscopeand recorded them.
|
| |
|
|
Medical Document
Sample : II |
|
As the figure2, shown,
the K1/siRNA and K2/siRNA just made expression of K-ras mRNA and
protein decreased but not disappear, the siRNAs could be provided
effective if they made expression decreased over 50 percent [12] .
The reasons they could not inhibit expression completely may be as
follow: (1) Intracellular expression of the transfected PCR
products had the problem about transfection efficiency; (2) Cells
are in the process of persistent division and siRNA could not
transfect into new born cells. K3/siRNA had no effect on
expression of K-ras and cells. It administrated that some siRNA
sequences designed with the exact principle were not effective. It
may be associated with genome position siRNA located, which be
influenced by genome secondary structure interacted with protein
[7] ; on the other hand, efficient RNAi requires a perfect match
of 21 bases between the interfering RNA and its target sequence |
As theFfigure
2, shows,n,the
K1/siRNA and K2/siRNA onlyjust
decreased themade
expression of K-ras mRNA and protein
decreasedbut did not
make it disappear, and,
the siRNAs werecould
be provided effective when
ifthey
madereduced
the expression bydecreased
over 50%percent[12].
The reasons why they could not
inhibit expression completely aremay
be as follows: (1)
Intracellular expression of the transfected PCR products had the
problem ofabout
transfection efficiency; (2) Cells beingare
in the process of persistent division,and
siRNA could not transfect into new born cells. K3/siRNA had no
effect on the expression of K-ras and
cells. It is heldadministrated
that some siRNA sequences designed with the exact principle were
not effective. It may be associated with genome position siRNA
locationed,
which isbe
influenced by genome secondary structure interactinged
with protein[7]; on the
other hand, efficient RNAi requires a perfect match of 21 bases
between the interfering RNA and its target sequence. |
| |
|
|
Legal Document
Sample : I |
|
In an arbitration case
concerning the fright disputes arising from a chartparty, the
Arbitration Commission sent the arbitration notices on date of 29
May 1998 to the both parties to request that each of them should
choose an arbitrator, and the two parties should jointly choose a
presiding arbitrator within 20 days from the date they receive the
notices. The claimant chose an arbitrator within the limited time,
while the respondent failed until the thirtieth of June 1998 . The
chairman of the Commission thus appointed an arbitrator for the
respondent in accordance with the regulations of the Rules. Then
the chairman of the Commission appointed a presiding arbitrator
for the two parties according to the Rules. Thus the 3 arbitrators
formed a tribunal to start reviewing the case. The respondent'
waiving its right to select arbitrator couldn't delay the time of
tribunal composition. |
In an arbitration case concerning the
frightfreight
disputes arising from a charter party, the Arbitration Commission
sent the arbitration notices on dateof
29 May 1998 tothe both the
parties to request that each of them should choose an arbitrator,
and that theye twoparties
should jointly choose a presiding arbitrator within 20 days from
the date ofthey receiptve
of the notices. The claimant chose an arbitrator within the
limited stipulated time, while
the respondent did not,failed
untilthe 30thirtiethof
June 1998. The chairman of the cCommission
thus appointed an arbitrator for the respondent in accordance with
the regulations of the
rRules. Then the chairman of
the cCommission appointed a
presiding arbitrator for the two parties according to the rRules.
Thus the three3 arbitrators
formed a tribunal to start reviewing the case. The respondent'
waiving its right to select an arbitrator could no't
delay the time oftribunal
formationcomposition. |
| |
|
|
Legal Document
Sample : II |
|
In a case of dispute
over damage to cargo and discharge fee on M/V “No1 An Ping”, the
shipowner (claimant) submitted the arbitration application to C
MAC in light of the arbitration clause in the chartparty on 26
January 2000 . The ship owner claimed amount of US Dollars 219514
over cargo damages and discharge fee and the interest. The
chartererer (respondent) neither chose the arbitrator nor
submitted its defense in writing within the limit time in
accordance with the Arbitration Rules. Moreover, the respondent
even refused to receive the arbitration documents. The Arbitration
Commission requested the ship owner's permission, and then sent
the arbitration documents to the charterer's last address supplied
by the shipowner by the service way. Therefore the collegial
tribunal was formed on 5 April 2000 and the tribunal held the oral
hearing in Shanghai on June 14 2000 . The charterer did not attend
the hearing. The tribunal had an oral haring and noticed the
information to the charter after the hearing, offering enough time
to the charterer for commenting the hearing. But the charterer
still had no reply. The tribunal issued an award by default
according to the written materials and the statements at the oral
hearing after discussion on 5 September 2000 . The final award
decided that the charterer should pay the ship owner Belgium
France 2.2 million over the cargo damage under the 4 B/ L, and
U.K. Pound 20 thousand over the discharge fee under the 4 B/L,
plus the damage over the two items interest at the rate of
7percent annul. The charterer should pay 60 % of the arbitration
fee. The award was inforced by the court at last. |
In a case
of dispute over damage to cargo and discharge fee on M/V “No1 An
Ping”, the shipownership
owner (claimant) submitted the arbitration application to
CMAC in light of the arbitration clause in the charter
party on 26 January 2000. The ship owner claimed an amount of US
$Dollars
219,514 overtowards
cargo damages,and
discharge fees and
theinterest. The chartererer
(respondent) neither chose the arbitrator nor submitted its
defense in writing within the limited time in accordance with the
Arbitration Rules. Moreover, the respondent even refused to
receive the arbitration documents. The Arbitration Commission
requested the ship owner's permission, and then sent the
arbitration documents to the charterer's last address supplied by
the ship owner by waythe
of serviceway.
Therefore the collegial tribunal was formed on 5 April 2000 and
the tribunal held the oral hearing in Shanghai on
14 June 142000.
The charterer did not attend the hearing. The tribunal heldad
an oral hearing and noticfied
the information to the charterer
after the hearing, offering enough time tothe
charterer for comment oning
the hearing. TButthe charterer
still did
hadnot reply. The tribunal
after discussion issued an award by
default according to the written materials and the statements at
the oral hearingafter discussion
on 5 September 2000. The final award decided
was that the charterer should pay the ship owner Belgianum
FranceF-2.2
million overtowardsthe
cargo damages under the 4 B/L,
and U.K.ŁPound
20,000thousand
overtowards the
discharge fee under the 4 B/L, plus
the damage
over the two itemsinterest at the rate of 7%percent
per annumannul.
The charterer should pay 60% of the arbitration fee. The award was
einforced by the court
at lastfinally. |
| |
|
|
Religious Document
Sample : I |
|
Since time immmorial,
there exists a conflict among the forces of truth and evil. Human
beings are often caught between the goodness of judge, and true
and the evils of ignorant, cruelty and falsehood. In this ever
existing struggle, every one tries to catch power by wealths,
material goods, possessions and lands. Thus, evil try to capture
the world.
From time and time,
God send prophets to free humans from the claws of evil and
oppress. Qur'an talks about how these prophets, guided people to
true, brotherhood and justice. The prophets - Nuh, Hud, Salih,
Ibrahim, Shu'ayb, Musa, 'Isa, Muhammad and others were simple,
humble men who struggle against social evils.
This books discusses the life, struggles, sacrifices and
achievements of prophets who appeared in past times to guide human
beings towards God.
|
Since time immemorial,
there exists a conflict among
between the forces of
truth
good and evil. Human beings are often caught between the
goodness of judgestice,
and truethtruth
and the evils of ignorantce,
cruelty and falsehood. In this ever
existing eternal struggle,
everyone tries to catchacquire
power by
through wealths ,
material goods, possessions and lands. Thus, evil tryies
to captureconquer
the world.
From time andto
time, God sendt
prophets to free humansity
from the claws of evil and oppression.
Qur'an talks about how these prophets,
guided the people
totowards
truethtruth,
brotherhood and justice. These
prophets - Nuh, Hud, Salih, Ibrahim, Shu'ayb, Musa, 'Isa, Muhammad
and others - were simple, humble men
who struggled against social evils.
This books
discusses the lifeves,
struggles, sacrifices and achievements of prophets who appeared in
pastancient
times to guide human beings towards God. |
|
